Myrtle Oak a First Responder

02 Apr

Quercus myrtifolia



Scrubby shrubby  Oaks helpful pre-info (and see photos below)

Myrtle Oak (Quercus myrtifolia). Usually small and shrubby, seldom over 15 (30) feet tall, leave almost hairless, shaped like the business end of a spoon,  evergreen.

Quercus myrtifolia 4

Myrtle Oak leaves look like spoons.


Sand-Live Oak (Q. geminata). Usually small and shrubby as encountered in early scrub, although potentially to over 70 feet tall as a full-sized tree. Leaves long and narrow with the margins rolled under, fuzzy beneath, semi-evergreen.

Chapman’s Oak (Q. chapmanii). Shrubby or often a small tree to about 30 feet tall, often encountered taller than Myrtle Oak.  Leaves variable, sometimes 3-lobed, nearly flat, a little hairy beneath,  larger than the other two, dark green and glossy-reflective above, deciduous.


Quercus myrtifolia 5

Myrtle Oak male flower clusters. (All photos today except the burned scrub by John Bradford.)

Today John and George climbed the Hobe Mountain (dune) tower in Jonathan Dickinson State Park near Hobe Sound, Florida.   We were up there for a photo project, with the botanical benefit of the best view in Martin County.  The vista sweeps across scrublands  subjected to prescribed burns.  The botanical take-home lesson is that Myrtle Oak is the early come-back kid after scrub fire.     Where all else seems disappeared, stressed,  laying low, or charred, the Myrtle Oak is green, vital, and in charge.

Quercus myrtifolia 6

Myrtle Oak acorns

Around here there are three main mostly shrubby scrub oaks, predominantly  Myrtle (Q. myrtifolia),  Chapman’s Oak (Q. chapmanii), and Sand Live Oak (Q. geminata).  Sometimes additional species make cameo roles, but we’ll focus on the main trio.

Quercus myrtifolia 7

Myrtle Oak on sugar sand

Ecologists have long been interested in succession, which is the parade of communities to occupy a site after disturbance such as flames.  Just like human settlements, pioneer ecological communities alter the conditions paving away for the next stage.    Succession following fire is a special case, because many species have diverse mechanisms  to survive the blaze  and bounce back, and then compete at different phases of succession, some winners early, others winner later.  These are important management questions, many species of conversation interest are best in early-successional environments, scrub jays, as a prominent example.

J.E. Freeman and collaborators at the University of Florida recently studied post-fire succession with reference to oaks.    Their data showed that, “Myrtle Oak was the most aggressive colonizer of postfire open space.”   So does the photo below taken this morning.


Burned scrub. Most of the light green is Myrtle Oak.

Freeman showed dominance to shift toward Sand-Live Oak at later stages.  Sand-Live Oaks, with their tendency to take over later, can grow into substantial trees to 70 feet tall, far larger than Myrtle Oak or Chapman’s.   Chapman’s seems at its best after the initial Myrtle Oak surge but well before late succession.

Quercus chapmanii with gall

Chapman’s Oak. Reflective leaves.  Red globe is a gall.

Having three oaks (plus sometimes others) commonly found mixed in an extreme habitat begs the question of how they co-exist without one “winner” with the others outcompeted to oblivion.    We have one hint already, they hit their strides at different point in succession.    Botanists have pointed out moreover, that within the world of oaks, they are not close relatives, and thus differ in demands and tolerances, although not often in any conspicuous fashion.  Tammy Foster in a 2014 doctoral dissertation looked into this and found some teaser surprises.  Echoing interests of Florida scrub ecologist Herman Kurz a century earlier, Foster investigated small elevational differences, finding that of our three scrub oaks all preferred high dry habitats.  But wait, one was a little different, Sand-Live Oak, grew also at lower elevations where it showed sensitivity to drought due to extending to a different soil type, underscoring what we already knew…that Sand-Live Oak is the least tied to early succession scrub.

Quercus germinata 8

Sand Live Oak. Narrow rolled leaves.

Foster found also that Chapman’s Oak bravely maintained normal photosynthetic ability during drought when the others closed up shop, a superpower perhaps permitted by its reflective leaves able to shed damaging light and heat.   So it is apparently out-photosynthesizing the others at dry times, but then, as the only deciduous species, concedes the rest of the year.

Tough to draw any big conclusions from all this, and yet eye-opening to catch glimpses of how three inevitable competitors carve out specialized coexistences with a little elbow room for each other.



Posted by on April 2, 2016 in Myrtle Oak, Uncategorized


7 responses to “Myrtle Oak a First Responder

  1. theshrubqueen

    April 2, 2016 at 8:14 am

    Hmm, reflective leaves very interesting. The Piedmont succession is Red Oaks with bigger, shinier leaves followed by White Oaks.

  2. George Rogers

    April 2, 2016 at 10:14 am

    Give me the Piedmont. Speaking of which, I was just up in Raleigh and Durham. And that sequence might be interestingly similarly–shiny gives sun tolerance (early succession), matte finish more shade tolerant and canopy-adapted.

  3. theshrubqueen

    April 2, 2016 at 2:24 pm

    It is interesting, seemingly more complicated, but probably not! Tulip Poplars are the dilemma? Much thinner leaves maybe explains that.

  4. George Rogers

    April 2, 2016 at 2:27 pm

    Well, just minor tendencies, loaded with exceptions.

  5. theshrubqueen

    April 2, 2016 at 3:50 pm

    Ecology, what a concept!

  6. Chris Lockhart

    April 5, 2016 at 11:18 am

    some other fun ways to identify myrtle and scrub live oak…
    Hairy tufts on the underside of the leaf, where the veins meet the midrib – “Myrtle has hairy arm pits” (offered by one of Dan Austin’s students you may know Alana).
    Sand live oak: thicker, glossy dark green leaves. when turned on it’s back, it looks like a little boat with its curved margins and grey underside.

    • George Rogers

      April 5, 2016 at 12:38 pm

      Good stuff-thanks


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: